Current:Home > NewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -FundWay
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Rekubit Exchange View
Date:2025-04-11 12:05:41
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (64)
Related
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- 20 Amazon Products To Use Instead Of Popping That Annoying Pimple
- Police crack down on 'Ndrangheta mafia in sweeping bust across Europe
- Here's why conspiracy theories about Jeffrey Epstein keep flourishing
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- The White House calls for more regulations as cryptocurrencies grow more popular
- This app compares Hubble and Webb images — the differences are astronomical
- Outlast Star Reveals Where They Stand With Their Former Teammates After That Crushing Finale
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- The Brazilian Scientists Inventing An mRNA Vaccine — And Sharing The Recipe
Ranking
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- King Charles III's coronation ceremony televised in the U.S.
- Star Wars and Harry Potter Actor Paul Grant Dead at 56
- Frankie Grande Recalls His and Sister Ariana Grande's Tearful Reaction to Her Wicked Casting
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
- Vanderpump Rules' Kristina Kelly Gives Birth, Welcomes First Baby With Max Ville
- Ellen Star Sophia Grace Cuddles Her Newborn Baby Boy in Sweet Video
- Facebook's parent company reports a drop in revenue for the first time ever
Recommendation
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Surreal or too real? Breathtaking AI tool DALL-E takes its images to a bigger stage
Star Wars and Harry Potter Actor Paul Grant Dead at 56
Law Roach Denies Telling Former Client Priyanka Chopra She's Not Sample-Sized
Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
Royals from around the world gathered for King Charles III's coronation. Here's who attended.
Star Wars and Harry Potter Actor Paul Grant Dead at 56
King Charles reminds U.K. commuters to mind the gap ahead of his coronation