Current:Home > FinanceFederal judge again strikes down California law banning high capacity gun magazines -FundWay
Federal judge again strikes down California law banning high capacity gun magazines
View
Date:2025-04-17 21:17:30
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.
The ruling from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez is likely not the final decision in this case. Benitez said his ruling will not take effect for 10 days, giving state Attorney General Rob Bonta enough time to appeal the decision.
This is the second time Benitez has truck down California’s law banning high-capacity magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.
But last year, the U.S. Supreme Court set a new standard for how to interpret the nation’s gun laws. The new standard relies more on the historical tradition of gun regulation rather than public interests, including safety.
The Supreme Court ordered the case to be heard again in light of the new standards. It’s one of three high-profile challenges to California gun laws that are getting new hearings in court. The other two cases challenge California laws banning assault-style weapons and limiting purchases of ammunition.
Benitez ruled “there is no American tradition of limiting ammunition capacity.” He said detachable magazines “solved a problem with historic firearms: running out of ammunition and having to slowly reload a gun.”
“There have been, and there will be, times where many more than 10 rounds are needed to stop attackers,” Benitez wrote. “Yet, under this statute, the State says ‘too bad.’”
California Attorney General Rob Bonta argued magazines larger than 10 rounds “are not necessary or even suitable to engage in private self-defense.”
Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle and Pistol Association, praised Benitez for a “thoughtful and in-depth approach.”
“Sure, the state will appeal, but the clock is ticking on laws that violate the Constitution,” Michel said.
veryGood! (23353)
Related
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- Troubled by Trump’s Climate Denial, Scientists Aim to Set the Record Straight
- Here’s How You Can Get $120 Worth of Olaplex Hair Products for Just $47
- Camila Cabello and Shawn Mendes’ Latest Reunion Will Have You Saying My Oh My
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Today’s Climate: June 30, 2010
- Despite its innocently furry appearance, the puss caterpillar's sting is brutal
- A high rate of monkeypox cases occur in people with HIV. Here are 3 theories why
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Mother of 6-year-old boy who shot his Virginia teacher faces two new federal charges
Ranking
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- How to show your friends you love them, according to a friendship expert
- Why Cities Suing Over Climate Change Want the Fight in State Court, Not Federal
- Can therapy solve racism?
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- New Federal Gas Storage Regulations Likely to Mimic Industry’s Guidelines
- Biden touts his 'cancer moonshot' on the anniversary of JFK's 'man on the moon' speech
- The economics behind 'quiet quitting' — and what we should call it instead
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
These Candidates See Farming as a Climate Solution. Here’s What They’re Proposing.
Today’s Climate: June 23, 2010
A judge temporarily blocks an Ohio law banning most abortions
Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
The heartbreak and cost of losing a baby in America
Film and TV actors set up strike at end of June, potentially crippling entertainment industry
Why Queen Camilla Officially Dropped Her Consort Title After King Charles III’s Coronation