Current:Home > reviewsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -FundWay
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-18 19:58:58
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (5178)
Related
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- Hillary Clinton to release essay collection about personal and public life
- Robert Pattinson gushes over 3-month-old baby daughter with Suki Waterhouse: 'I'm amazed'
- Family of 6 found dead by rescuers after landslide in eastern China
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will plead guilty in deal with US and return to Australia
- 16-year-old Quincy Wilson to run men's 400m final tonight at U.S. Olympic trials
- Pennsylvania woman drowns after being swept over waterfall in Glacier National Park
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- North Carolina Senate approves spending plan adjustments, amid budget impasse with House
Ranking
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Police ask Texas prosecutors to treat attempted drowning of 3-year-old child as a hate crime
- Video captures shocking moment when worker comes face-to-face with black bear at Tennessee park
- Taylor Swift Still Swooning Over Travis Kelce's Eras Tour Debut
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- XXL Freshman Class 2024: Cash Cobain, ScarLip, Lay Bankz, more hip-hop newcomers make the cut
- What Euro 2024 games are today? England, France, Netherlands vie for group wins
- Federal lawsuit challenges Georgia law that limits many people or groups to posting 3 bonds a year
Recommendation
Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
Kaitlyn Bristowe and Zac Clark Attend Same NHL Finals Game as Jason Tartick and Kat Stickler
Tornado confirmed in Dublin, New Hampshire, as storms swept across New England on Sunday
Don't Miss GAP's Limited-Time Extra 50% Off Sale: $15 Sweaters, $17 Cargos & More
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
Catastrophic flooding in Minnesota leaves entire communities under feet of water as lakes reach uncontrollable levels
Hooters closing underperforming restaurants due to 'current market conditions'
Biden and Trump face off this week in the first presidential debate. Here's what we know so far about the debate, prep and more